Diastereoselective Synthesis of Saturated 14-Membered Ring γ-Hydroxy Macrolides

Abstract

Stereoselective synthesis of two diastereomers of a saturated 14-membered γ-hydroxy macrolide using conformational stereocontrol is reported.

macrocycles - lactones - macrolides - diastereoselectivity - conformational stereocontrol

References

<A NAME="RE00301SS-1A">1a</A> For some examples, see: Still WC. Novac VJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1984,  106:  1148 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-1B">1b</A> Paterson I. Rawson DJ. Tetrahedron Lett.  1989,  30:  7463 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-2A">2a</A> Still WC. MacPherson LJ. Harada T. Callahan JF. Rheingold AL. Tetrahedron  1984,  40:  2275 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-2B">2b</A> Tércio J. Ferreira B. Simonelli F. Tetrahedron  1990,  46:  6311 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-3">3</A> Kaisalo L. Koskimies J. Hase T. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2  2000,  1477 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-4">4</A> For previous studies concerning conformationally controlled reductions of saturated 14-membered ring ketolactones, see: Neeland EG. Ounsworth JP. Sims RJ. Weiler L. J. Org. Chem.  1994,  59:  7383  and references cited therein

<A NAME="RE00301SS-5">5</A> Luche J.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1978,  100:  2226 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-6">6</A> Inanaga J. Hirata K. Saeki H. Katsuki T. Yamaguchi M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.  1979,  52:  1989 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-7">7</A>

The diastereomeric ratio of the acetylated products was determined by GC.

<A NAME="RE00301SS-8">8</A> MacroModel V6.5: Mohamadi F. Richards NGJ. Guida WC. Liskamp R. Lipton M. Caulfield C. Chang G. Hendrickson T. DeGust F. Still WC. J. Comput. Chem.  1990,  11:  440 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-9">9</A>

The calculations of 4 should be considered as approximate because some of the force field (MM3*) parameters were low quality parameters. We did the calculations also in an MM2* force field but many of the obtained low energy conformations violated the Schweizer-Dunitz rule. [11]

<A NAME="RE00301SS-10">10</A> Still WC. Galynker I. Tetrahedron  1981,  37:  3981 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-11">11</A> Schweizer WB. Dunitz JD. Helv. Chim. Acta  1982,  65:  1547 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-12">12</A>

Structural assignments of products 5 and 6 are based on the differences in the ¹H NMR shifts and coupling constants of the starting materials 7 and 9 [3] and on the X-ray structure of 9.

<A NAME="RE00301SS-13A">13a</A> Cerveny L. Lövyová A. Ruzicka V. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.  1980,  45:  3532 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-13B">13b</A> Kraus M. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.  1972,  37:  460 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-13C">13c</A> Sehgal RK. Koeningsberger RU. Howard TJ. J. Org. Chem.  1975,  40:  3073 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-14">14</A> Kaisalo L. Koskimies J. Hase T. Synthesis  1996,  1122  and references cited therein

<A NAME="RE00301SS-15A">15a</A> Mori K. Nomi H. Chuman T. Kohno M. Kato K. Noguchi M. Tetrahedron  1982,  38:  3705 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-15B">15b</A> Terinek M. Kozmik V. Palecek J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.  1997,  62:  1325 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-15C">15c</A> Kitazume T. Asai M. Tsukamoto T. Yamazaki T. J. Fluorine Chem.  1992,  56:  271 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-16">16</A> Nagahama N. Takamori I. Suzuki M. Chem. Pharm. Bull.  1971,  19:  655 

<A NAME="RE00301SS-17">17</A> Greene TW. Wuts PGM. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis   2nd ed.:  Wiley; New York: 1991.